You are here: Home › Staff › Hannah Dames (Tschannen)

Hannah Dames (Tschannen)

Hannah

 

Research Interests

  • Intentional Forgetting in Long-Term and Working Memory
  • Directed Forgetting of Stimulus-Based Associations
  • Cognitive Models of Human Reasoning
  • Human-Computer-Interaction
  • Action Control

 

Projects

  • Intentional Forgetting within Organizations: The project is part of the Schwerpunktprogramm "Intentional Forgetting in Organisations"  (SPP 1921), namely ‘FADE’  (to the project), funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Teaching

  • Seminar SS 2021: Cognitive Modeling

Publications & Conference Papers

  • Dames, H., & Oberauer, K. (2022). Directed forgetting in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001256
  • Popov, V., & Dames, H. (2022). Intent matters: Resolving the intentional versus incidental learning paradox in episodic long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001272
  • Dames, H., Kiesel, A., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (2022). Evidence for a Selective Influence of Short-Term Experiences on the Retrieval of Item-Specific Long-Term Bindings. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 32. http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.223
  • Dames, H., Brand, D., & Ragni, M. (2022). Evidence for Multiple Mechanisms Underlying List-Method Directed Forgetting. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
  • Dames, H., Kiesel, A., Pfeuffer, C., & Ragni, M. (2022). Intentional Forgetting of Habits? Combining List-Method Directed Forgetting and Item-Specific Stimulus-Response Priming. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
  • Brand, D., Dames, H., Puricelli, L., & Ragni, M. (2022). Rule-Based Categorization: Measuring the Cognitive Costs of Intentional Rule Updating. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
  • Straub, E. R., Dames, H., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2022). Does body posture reduce the Stroop effect? Evidence from two conceptual replications and a meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103497
  • Dames, H., Klauer, K. C., & Ragni, M. (2021). The stability of syllogistic reasoning performance over time. Thinking & Reasoning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1992012
  • Dames, H., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (2021). On the interdependence of post-error control and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(10), 1738–1758. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001057
  • Dames, H., Schiebel, C., & Ragni, M. (2020). The Role of Feedback and Post-Error Adaptations in Reasoning. In S. Denison, M. M. Y. Xu, & B. C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3254-3260). Cognitive Science Society
  • Brandt, D., Riesterer, N., Dames, H., & Ragni, M. (2020). Analyzing the Differences in Human Reasoning via Joint Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. In S. Denison, M. M. Y. Xu, & B. C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3254-3260). Cognitive Science Society.
  • Riesterer, N., Brand, D., Dames, H., & Ragni, M. (2020). Modeling human syllogistic reasoning: The role of "No Valid Conclusion". Topics in Cognitive Science, 12, 446-459
  • Ragni, M.*, Dames, H.*, Brand, D., & Riesterer, N. (2019) When does a reasoner respond: Nothing follows?, In Goel, A., Seifert, C., & Freska, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. *authors contributed equally
  • Riesterer, N.*, Brand, D.*, Dames, H., & Ragni, M. (2019) Modeling human syllogistic reasoning: The role of "No Valid Conclusion", In Goel, A., Seifert, C., & Freska, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. *authors contributed equally
  • Ragni, M., Dames, H., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2019). A meta-analysis of conditional reasoning. In Goel, A., Seifert, C., & Freska, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
  • Dames, H., Hirschfeld, G., Sackmann, T. & Thielsch, M. T. (2019). Searching vs. Browsing - The influence of consumers’ goal directedness on website evaluations. Interacting with Computers. 31(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz006
  • Dames, H., von Hartz, J. O., Kantz, M., Riesterer, N., & Ragni, M (2018). Multinomial processing models for syllogistic reasoning: A comparison. In T. Rogers, M. Rau, J. Zhu, & C. Kalish (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1584-1589). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
  • Timm IJ, Staab S, Siebers M, Schon C, Schmid U, Sauerwald K, Reuter L, Ragni M, Niederée C, Maus H, Kern-Isberner G, Jilek C, Friemann P, Eiter T, Dengel A, Dames H, Bock T, Berndt JO, Beierle C (2018) Intentional forgetting in artificial intelligence systems: Perspectives and challenges. In: Trollmann F, Turhan A (eds) KI 2018: advances in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, vol 11117, pp. 357–365. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00111-7_30
  • Dames, H., Sackmann, T. & Thielsch, M. T. (2017). Die Sicht des Kunden: Unterschiede in der Website-Bewertung. In: S. Hess, H. Fischer (Hrsg.), Mensch und Computer 2017 – Usability Professionals (S. 297-303). Regensburg: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. und German UPA e.V. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2017-up-0167